. Artikel 35(There are two Application no.55361/00 and no.55363/00)
COUR EUROPEENNE
DES
DROITS DE L'HOMME
CONSEIL DE LEUROPE
SRASBOURG
EUROPEAN COURT
OF
HUMAN RIGHTS
COUNCIL OF EUROPE
STRASBOURG
Mil Jan WIND
Platanvej 42
DK -8900 RANDERS
SECOND SECTION
ECHR-LE11.lR
SN/mkr
17 MAI 2000
Application no.55361/00
Mil Jan WIND v. Denmark
Dear Sir,
With regard to the above application, I should inform you that the European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) decided on 28 April 2000, afier having deliberated, that the said application was inadmissible. A copy of the decision is enclosed herewith.
This decision is final and is not subject to any appeal either to the Court or to any other body.
The present communication is made in pursuance of Rule 56 §2 of the Rules of Court.
Yours faithfully,
Erik Fribergh
Section Registrar
Enc. Decision
ADRESSE POSTALE / POSTAL ADDRESS:
CONSEIL DE L´EUROPE I COUNCIL OF EUROPE
F-67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX
TELEPHONE: (0)3 88 41 20 18
INTERNET: http://www.echr.coe.int
TELECOPIEUR/FAX: (0)3 88 41 27 30
CONSEIL
COUNCIL
OF EUROPE
COUR EUROPEENNE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
Application no.55361/00
By Mil Jan WIND
against Denmark
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of
Mr G. BONELLO, President,
Mr P. LORENZEN,
Mrs M. TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA,
And Mr E. FRIBERGH, Section Registrar,
Delivered the following unanimous decision on 28 April 2000:
The Court has examined the applicant's complaints as they have been submitted and has noted that the applicant has been informed of the possible obstacles to the admissibility of the application. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that the application must be rejected, in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Court
Declares the aplication inadmissible.
Erik Fribergh
Registrar
Giovanni BONELLO
President
COUR EUROPEENNE
EUROPEAN COURT
OF
HUMAN RIGHTS
COUNCIL OF EUROPE
STRASBOURG
Mil Jan WIND
Platanvej 42
DK -8900 RANDERS
SECOND SECTION
ECHR-LE11.lR
SN/mkr
17 MAI 2000
Application no.55363/00
Mil Jan WIND v. Denmark
Dear Sir,
With regard to the above application, I should inform you that the European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) decided on 28 April 2000, afier having deliberated, that the said application was inadmissible. A copy of the decision is enclosed herewith.
This decision is final and is not subject to any appeal either to the Court or to any other body.
The present communication is made in pursuance of Rule 56 §2 of the Rules of Court.
Yours faithfully,
Erik Fribergh
Section Registrar
Enc. Decision
ADRESSE POSTALE / POSTAL ADDRESS:
CONSEIL DE L´EUROPE I COUNCIL OF EUROPE
F-67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX
TELEPHONE: (0)3 88 41 20 18
INTERNET: http://www.echr.coe.int
TELECOPIEUR/FAX: (0)3 88 41 27 30
CONSEIL
DE L'EUROPE
COUNCIL
OF EUROPE
COUR EUROPEENNE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
Application no.55363/00
By Mil Jan WIND
against Denmark
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of
Mr G. BONELLO, President,
Mr P. LORENZEN,
Mrs M. TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA,
And Mr E. FRIBERGH, Section Registrar,
Delivered the following unanimous decision on 28 April 2000:
The Court has examined the applicant's complaints as they have been submitted and has noted that the applicant has been informed of the possible obstacles to the admissibility of the application. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that the application must be rejected, in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Court
Declares the aplication inadmissible.
Erik Fribergh
Registrar
Giovanni BONELLO
President
. Artikel 35
Kriterier for antagelse til behandling i realiteten
Stk. 1. Domstolen må kun optage sagen til behandling, når alle nationale retsmidler er blevet udtømt i overensstemmelse med de af folkeretten almindeligt anerkendte regler, og inden for et tidsrum af 6 måneder fra den dato, den endelige afgørelse blev truffet.
Stk. 2. Domstolen må ikke behandle nogen individuel klage efter artikel 34, som
a) er anonym, eller
b) i det væsentlige er identisk med en sag, der allerede er blevet undersøgt af Domstolen eller allerede har været underkastet anden form for international undersøgelse eller afgørelse, og som ikke indeholder nye oplys-ninger af betydning.
Stk. 3. Domstolen skal afvise en klage, der forelægges den i henhold til artikel 34, når den anser den for uforenelig med bestemmelserne i nærværende konvention eller de dertil knyttede
protokoller, for åbenbart ugrundet eller for at være misbrug af klageadgangen.
Stk. 4. Domstolen skal afvise enhver klage, som den anser for uforenelig med denne artikel. Den kan gøre dette på ethvert trin i proceduren.
Rule 56
(Decision of a Chamber)
1. The decision of the Chamber shall state whether it was taken unanimously or by a majority and shall be accompanied or followed by reasons.
2. The decision of the Chamber shall be communicated by the Registrar to the applicant and to the Contracting Party or Parties concerned.